Here is a nice deterministic result about approximating continuous functions in $[0, 1]$ proved using ideas from probability theory. This was the final proof presented in my real analysis lecture, and its quite slick. $ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\lVert #1 \rVert} \newcommand{\abs}[1]{| #1 |} \newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}} \newcommand{\E}{\mathbb{E}} \renewcommand{\Pr}{\mathbb{P}} \newcommand{\ind}{\mathbf{1}} $
Before we get to the main result, a bit of notation. Let the space of continuous real valued functions on $[0, 1]$ be $$ \begin{align*} C([0, 1]) := \{ f : [0, 1] \rightarrow \R \;|\; f \text{ is continuous} \} \:. \end{align*} $$ Recall that we can endow $C([0, 1])$ with the metric $d(f, g) := \sup_{x \in [0, 1]} \abs{f(x) - g(x)}$, which turns $(C([0, 1]), d)$ into a metric space. Let $\norm{f}_\infty := d(f, 0)$, and define $$ \begin{align*} \mathcal{P} := \{ x \mapsto \sum_{i=0}^{N} w_i x^i \;|\; w_i \in \R, 0 \leq N < \infty \} \:, \end{align*} $$ to be the space of real valued polynomials. We will prove the following proposition.
Proposition: $\mathcal{P}$ is dense in $C([0, 1])$ endowed with the supremum metric $d$.
Before we proceed with the proof, note that this is a deterministic statement about the structure of the metric space $(C([0, 1]), d)$. Yet, we will exhibit a constructive proof which uses concentration of measure ideas quite nicely.Proof: We first construct a stochastic process $\mathcal{T}_n$ on $[0, 1]$. For every $x \in [0, 1]$, let $S_n^{(x)} \sim \mathrm{Binom}(n, x)$, and put $\mathcal{T}_n := \{ S_n^{(x)} \;|\; x \in [0, 1] \}$. The first observation to make is that the function $x \mapsto \E f(S_n^{(x)}/n) \in \mathcal{P}$. This can easily be seen, since $$ \E f(S_n^{(x)}/n) = \sum_{k=0}^{n} f(k/n) {n \choose k} x^{k} (1-x)^{n-k} \:. $$ Hence we can define a polynomial $p_n \in \mathcal{P}$ as $$ p_n(x) := \E f(S_n^{(x)}/n) \:. $$ Now, we define the event $G_{x,t}$ for $x \in [0, 1]$ and $t > 0$ as $$ G_{x, t} := \{ \abs{S_n^{(x)}/n - x} \leq t \} \:. $$ Since $\E S_n^{(x)}/n = nx / n = x$, we have by Markov's inequality that $$ \Pr(G_{x, t}^c) \leq t^{-2} \E( S_n^{(x)}/n - x )^2 = t^{-2} n^{-1} x(1-x) \leq \frac{1}{4} t^{-2} n^{-1} \:. $$ Now, for any $x \in [0, 1]$, we have $$ \begin{align*} \abs{ p_n(x) - f(x) } = \abs{ \E f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) } \stackrel{(a)}{\leq} \E \abs{ f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) } \:, \end{align*} $$ where (a) is Jensen's inequality. Hence, we simply need to control the quantity $\E \abs{ f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) }$ for all $x \in [0, 1]$. Since $f$ is continuous on $[0, 1]$ and $[0, 1]$ is compact, $f$ is uniformly continuous on $[0, 1]$. We now fix an $\epsilon > 0$, and let $\delta > 0$ be such that for all $x, y \in [0, 1]$, if $\abs{x-y} < \delta$ then $\abs{f(x) - f(y)} < \epsilon/2$. With this in mind, if $n > \norm{f}_\infty / \epsilon\delta^2$, we have $$ \begin{align*} \E \abs{ f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) } &= \E \abs{ f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) }\ind_{G_{x,\delta}} + \E \abs{ f(S_n^{(x)}/n) - f(x) }\ind_{G_{x,\delta}^c} \\ &\leq \epsilon/2 + 2 \norm{f}_\infty \Pr( G_{x,\delta}^c ) \\ &\leq \epsilon/2 + \frac{1}{2} \norm{f}_\infty \delta^{-2} n^{-1} \\ &\leq \epsilon \:. \end{align*} $$ Since this holds for any $x \in [0, 1]$, we therefore have $$ \begin{align*} d(p_n, f) = \sup_{x \in [0, 1]} \abs{p_n(x) - f(x)} \leq \epsilon \:. \end{align*} $$ Since $\epsilon > 0$ is arbitrary, we have what we wanted to prove.